Below is a copy of the questionnaire that we handed out to the viewers of our doucmentary:
Circle the answer that yo find most appropriate:
1. On a scale of 1-5, how entertaining would you rate our documentary? (1=very entertaining, 5= not entertaining)
1 2 3 4 5
2. How eye-catching did you find our newspaper advertisement, on a scale of 1-5? (1= very interesting, 5= not interesting)
1 2 3 4 5
3. How much would you say our documentary compared to other professional documentaries? (1= compared well, 5= didnt compare at all)
1 2 3 4 5
4. What would you rate the technical quality used in our documentary? (eg sound, editing quality)(1= very good technical quality, 5= not good technical quality)
1 2 3 4 5
5. Did our radio advertisement make you want to watch the documentary? (1= yes, 5= no)
1 2 3 4 5
6. After watching the first five minutes of our documentary, did you want to continue and watch the full 30 minute program? (1= yes, 5= no)
1 2 3 4 5
7. How much would you say that our documentary was appropriate for channel 4 and compares to other channel 4 documentaries? (1= very appropriate, 5=not appropriate)
1 2 3 4 5
8. Would you say that our radio advert and newspaper advert were informative of our documentary? (1= very informative, 5= not informative)
1 2 3 4 5
9. Would you say that the cutaways we used through our documentary were relevant and appropriate? (1= very relevant, 5= not relevant)
1 2 3 4 5
10. On a scale of 1-5, how appropriate was the voiceover that was used in the radio advert and documentary? ( 1- very appropriate, 5= not appropriate)
1 2 3 4 5
11. How would you rate the music choice seen in the documentary and radio advert? (1= good music choice, 5= bad music choices)
1 2 3 4 5
Below is a graph showing the results that we collected from the 15 people that filled in our questionairre. From these results we concluded that overall our documentary was thought to be a success by the viewers and that it was persuasive and infromative for them. The weakest parts of our documentary that have been higlighted from the results of the questionnaires would be the persuasiveness of the radio advert on the reader, and also the effectiveness of the voiceover alltogether. I think that the voiceover was one of the weakest elements of our documentary and radio advert and would be one thing we would change if we were to do this again. We would have changed the voice used to be better suited to the theme of the documentary and to draw more attention during the radio advert etc. The most positive thing we recieved through the questionairre was about our choice of music for the radio advert and the documentary, we feel that we did make a good choice with our choice of music and that it presented the tone of our docuementary perfectly and also the beats of the music fitted well with the photoshoot at the beggining of the documentary making it look more professional.
Below are some other comments we recieved on our documentary from the viewers who filled out the questionairre:
"I thought that the print advert looked really interesting and made me want to watch the documentary. I also thought the documentary itself was informative about fashions from the past and I also really liked the music in the documentary."
"The radio advert was good because the music attracted peoples attention straight away and made me want to watch the documentary. I would have liked to watch the whole 30 minutes of the documentary."
"I liked that the real channel 4 logo was used on the poster because it made it look really real and the writing that was on the poster looked like a real channel 4 advert. I liked the documentary because it was fun and exciting and i learned about fashion from the past and where it came from."
"I didnt know much about fashion from the past before watching the documentary but even after the first 5 minutes i learned a lot and would have definitley watched the whole 30 minutes."
No comments:
Post a Comment